Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Needs not met

Task force plans to improve services for disabled

Published: Monday, May 4, 2009

Updated: Monday, January 18, 2010 10:01

0502_DISABLE-3_mns.jpg

Disabled students at UTEP such as Mike Sanchez finds it difficult to open doors, get to class on time and cross streets on campus.

It has been more than 15 years since a few disability advocacy centers filed and won a lawsuit against UTEP because the school did not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some changes were made as a result of the civil action, but disabled students at UTEP still have reasons to complain.

Getting to class on time is a challenge for many of them, who sometimes need to wait until vehicle traffic clears to cross a street or until someone else opens the door of a campus building.

"With my disability being Spinal Muscular Atrophy, my physical movement is not much," said Emmanuel Arzate, freshman student and SGA senator at-large elect. "When I go into buildings that don't have the button that one pushes to open the door, I can't do it, so I have to wait for someone to open the doors for me."

In one of the most popular buildings, the Union Building East, students may also have some problems. Students with a visual impairment, for example, perceive things that are on the floor, but they can't see the projections of the stairs and they are at risk of hitting their heads.

About 300 students with hearing, physical and psychological disabilities and visual impairment are registered with the Disabled Student Services Office, which supports them through interpreters, class note takers, classroom accommodations and arrangements to extend test times.

Neelam Agarwal, DSSO assistant director, said UTEP's location doesn't help disabled students.

"We are moving in a good direction, but we have some problems to deal with, much of them because UTEP is on a hill," she said.

Hector Flores, DSSO coordinator of services, said the department makes arrangements to accommodate students in accessible buildings.

"If a student is registered in a class in a building that is not quite accessible, we move classes around," Flores said.

The Student Government Association developed a task force to solve the problems that disabled students face.

Administrators from departments such as Parking and Transportation Services, College of Education and College of Health Sciences met with SGA April 15 to explore what can be done to improve disabled students services.

"We try to join all the UTEP resources to support the DSSO," said Leo Negrete, senate majority leader. "It was only the first meeting of many others."

Members of the Miner Diamonds, a student organization whose main goal is promote awareness, educate and sensitize students, staff and faculty about disability issues, participated in the meeting.

Some changes SGA will work for include the installment of sensors on automatic doors, a golf-cart initiative for handicap students, specialized tutoring for mentally impaired students, traffic guards and subtitles in the Union Cinema.

Negrete said some of the newly elected members will work to improve services for disabled students at UTEP in the 2009-10 school year.

"As senator at-large, I would like to get input of people with different types of disabilities and see what their concerns are," Arzate said.

Did you know?

•In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law. The act prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and guarantee them access to all public programs. In 1992, most of the provisions took effect.

•The Disabled Ability Resource Environment and IMAGE advocacy centers sued UTEP in December, 1993 because the 65 buildings of the university were not providing access to disabled students.

•The SGA task force said the UTEP campus has 91 buildings but constructions like Old Main, Education, Quinn Hall, Hudspeth Hall, Worrell Hall and Bell Hall are among the most inaccessible buildings for disabled students.

Nicole Chávez may be reached at prospector@utep.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

2 comments

Robert Gross
Tue Apr 6 2010 05:46
The following was sent To Mss. Fowler of the Nursing program at UTEP:

Mss. Fowler,

Mss. Fowler. My name is SGT Robert Gross (United States Army Depoyed Iraq), I am the husband of Alison Gross. Recently I was forwarded an email from you explaining you wished my wife to withdraw from the Nursing Program at UTEP. You explained her limitations (no lifting, no bending, no standing for any length of time) related to her degenerative disc disease, would definitely impact her ability to fulfill clinical objectives in the nursing program. This statement begs the question, why admit such a student given a fully documented and disclosed physical profile and physical examination, then threaten to fail that individual for failing to meet objectives while refusing to make reasonable accommodations as per the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? You go on to state “Patient transfer, turning patients, and assisting patients with toileting and ambulation are tasks expected of nurses in most clinical settings – these are appropriate interventions that you would not be able to do – and having others to help is definitely not always an option.” This clearly demonstrates your intentions not to “always” make such accommodations as is required by the ADA during her schooling at UTEP given her previously fully disclosed limitations.

Mss. Fouler, The actions of the UTEP Nursing Program have taken will measurably and negatively impacted my family. You have admitted a student you sate could not have completed the learning objectives based on a physical profile established before the program began and refuse to make accommodations for that profile while happily collecting her GI bill. This has robed my wife of a year of salary and tuition. Thus I see only two possible outcomes to what has been set in motion. You will make reasonable accommodations for the student you knowingly admitted with fully disclosed limitations, or pay restitution for the damage caused to my family. I have contacted the Judge Advocate General (JAG) concerning the matter. Their offices state such unfair treatment of service members and their families may lead to the classification of an establishment by the Department of Defense as off limits to all DOD employees. This policy is often used to ensure auto dealerships do not prey on unsuspecting soldiers. It is uncommon for an educational establishment to behave so nefariously as to demand such sanctions but they are certainly far from being above the law. Furthermore, my wife will be contacting an attorney Monday as JAG will not be able to handle the case beyond establishing sanctions. I will be making formal complaints with the State Attorney General’s Office, ACLU, the BBB, and ripoffreport.com.

My family deserves an answer to these questions in a timely fashion. I have taken the time out of a busy schedule of war fighting in Iraq to gather this information and present it to you and your superiors. Please offer me the courtesy of a swift reply.

V/R,

Robert S. Gross

Anonymous
Sun Feb 7 2010 06:14
I also would like to add that many students and some staff have a disriminatory behavior toward minorities . I witnessed a Hispanic staff denied a service toward an Indian student. I also heard many students who complained about an Asian professor because of his accent.






log out